
Educational
Assessment:
Assessing Student Learning in the Classroom
|
Instructor Name: |
Dr. Karen Lea |
|
Phone: |
509-891-7219 |
|
Office Hours: |
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST
Monday – Friday |
|
Email: |
|
|
Address: |
Virtual Education
Software |
|
|
23403 E Mission Avenue,
Suite 220F |
|
|
Liberty Lake, WA 99019 |
|
Technical Support: |
Welcome to Educational Assessment: Assessing Student Learning in the Classroom! Curriculum, instruction, and assessment work together to support student learning. Students are provided with opportunities to learn the skills, concepts, and work-study practices necessary to be successful in classrooms. Assessments measure student progress toward the standards, help teachers identify each student's instructional needs, and inform parents about what and how their child is learning. The assessments also help to gauge how well schools are supporting the achievement of all students.
However, no matter how many assessments there are, without educators able to use assessments, those assessments are worthless. As educators, we must know how to conduct the assessment, interpret the data, and develop priorities for action. We also must take into account data from other sources, notably the parents and psychologists. We then have to put all this information into some organized format and make the information clear to colleagues and parents.
To do this, we have to bring our skills and
knowledge about the subject matter into play while answering these questions:
·
What is the prerequisite
knowledge for this area of the curriculum?
·
How important is the particular area?
·
Would having a “less than
very high” level of competence in one area predispose
the child to failure in other areas?
·
How much time should be
spent on a particular topic?
·
Should we consider an
alternative area?
This computer-based instruction course is a self-supporting program that provides instruction, structured practice, and evaluation all on your home or school computer. Technical support information can be found in the Help section of your course.
|
Title: |
Educational Assessment: Assessing
Student Learning in the Classroom |
|
Publisher: |
Virtual Education Software, inc.
2005, Revised 2010, Revised 2013, Revised 2016, Revised 2019, Revised 2022,
Revised 2026 |
|
Instructor: |
Dr. Karen Lea |
The structure and format of most distance-learning courses presume a high level of personal and academic integrity in completion and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a distance-learning course are expected to adhere to the following standards of academic conduct.
Academic work submitted by the individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the student’s own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if they are one’s own work is unacceptable.
Students are required to view/read each screen in each exercise of each chapter. Screens, exercises and chapter content may not be skipped. Students are also required to access and read all content in each course handout. A participant who fails to complete the entire course in the manner intended and as outlined, may have their grade reduced or fail the course. It is the student's responsibility to contact the facilitator, instructor-of-record, or VESi registrar if there is any question as to the manner in which this course is to be completed.
The individual will encourage honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or information to another person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used improperly.
Violations of these
academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade and
subsequent loss of credit for the course.
Assessment of learning is a complex process and it is important to be clear about the purpose of the assessment. At the conclusion of this course students will be able to:
·
Articulate the purpose
and types of educational assessments
·
Create high quality
assessments for the classroom
This course will cover many areas and topics on educational assessment. The following is an outline of the topics that will be discussed in each chapter of the course.
Course Overview
History of education assessment
What is educational assessment
Discrepancy gap
Effective assessments
Validity/Reliability/Accuracy
Common Core and assessments
ELL and Special Needs Students
Summative assessments
Formative assessments
Performance-based
Portfolios
Rubrics
Checklists
Learning centers
Other types
Multiple Choice
True/False
Essay
Short Answer
Feedback
As a student you will be expected to:
·
Students are required to view/read each screen in each exercise
of each chapter. Screens, exercises and chapter content may not be
skipped. Students are also required to access and read all content in each
course handout.
·
Complete all four
section examinations, showing a competent understanding of the material presented.
You must obtain an overall score of 70% or
higher, with no individual exam
score below 50%, and successfully complete ALL writing assignments to pass this
course. *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by
college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to
determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete a review of any
section on which your examination score was below 50%.
·
Retake any examination,
after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a
minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a
minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please note: Minimum
exam score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you
should refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score
requirements are.
·
Complete all course
journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word count shown
for each writing assignment.
·
Complete a course
evaluation form at the end of the course.
At the end of each section, you will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess your knowledge. You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last score will save, not the highest score. After your third attempt, each examination will lock and not allow further access. The average from your exam scores will be printed on your certificate. However, this is not your final grade since your required writing assignments have not been reviewed. Exceptionally written or poorly written required writing assignments, or violation of the academic integrity policy in the course syllabus, will affect your grade. As this is a self-paced computerized instruction program, you may review course information as often as necessary. You will not be able to exit any examinations until you have answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam section before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.
All assignments are
reviewed and may impact your final grade. Exceptionally or poorly written
assignments, or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy (see course syllabus
for policy), will affect your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is determined
by your writing assignments, and your overall exam score determines the other
fifty percent. Refer to the Essay Grading
Guidelines, which were sent as an attachment with your
original course link. You should also
refer to the Course Syllabus Addendum, which was sent as an attachment with
your original course link, to determine if you have any writing assignments in
addition to the Critical Thinking Questions (CTQ) and Journal Article
Summations (JAS). If you do, the Essay Grading Guidelines will also apply.
Your writing assignments must meet the minimum word count and are not to include the question or your final citations as part of your word count. In other words, the question and citations are not to be used as a means to meet the minimum word count.
There are four CTQs that you are required to complete. You will need to write a minimum of 500 words (maximum 1,000) per essay. You should explain how the information that you gained from the course will be applied and clearly convey a strong understanding of the course content as it relates to each CTQ. To view the questions, click on REQUIRED ESSAY and choose the CTQ that you are ready to complete; this will bring up a screen where you may enter your essay. Prior to course submission, you may go back at any point to edit your essay, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits.
You must click SAVE
before you write another essay or move on to another part of the course.
You are required to write, in your own words, a summary on a total of three peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles (one article per JAS), written by an author with a Ph.D., Ed.D., or similar, on the topic outlined within each JAS section in the “Required Essays” portion of the course (blogs, abstracts, news articles, or similar are not acceptable). Your article choice must relate specifically to the discussion topic listed in each individual JAS. You will choose a total of three relevant articles (one article per JAS) and write a thorough summary of the information presented in each article (you must write a minimum of 200 words with a 400 word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the journal name, volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the facilitator to access and review each article.
To write your summary, click on REQUIRED ESSAYS and choose the JAS that you would like to complete. A writing program will automatically launch where you can write your summary. When you are ready to stop, click SAVE. Prior to course submission you may go back at any point to edit your summaries but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits. For more information on the features of this assignment, please consult the HELP menu.
You must click SAVE
before you write another summary or move on to another part of the course.
Karen Lea holds a Ph.D. in education, has TEFL certification, and has been Project Management Professional certified. Dr. Lea has 15 years’ experience teaching at the K–12 level and another 17 years’ experience teaching education and leadership courses at the undergraduate and post-graduate levels. She has decades of experience developing online course content and assessment and teaching online. Dr. Lea has been professionally published over 15times and has served on more than a dozen panels and boards, including serving on the NCATE (CAEP) Board of Examiners.
You may contact the instructor by emailing karen_lea@virtualeduc.com or by calling 509-891-7219, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. PST. Phone messages will be answered within 24 hours. Phone conferences will be limited to ten minutes per student, per day, given that this is a self-paced instructional program. Please do not contact the instructor about technical problems, course glitches, or other issues that involve the operation of the course.
If you have questions or problems related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the problem persists please check our support pages for FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of your course.
If you need personal assistance then email support@virtualeduc.com or call 509-891-7219. When contacting technical support, please know your course version number (it is located at the bottom left side of the Welcome Screen) and your operating system, and be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call.
Please refer to VESi’s website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further questions about the compatibility of your operating system.
Refer to the addendum
regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be
Submitted, and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also
note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete
that are not listed in this syllabus.
Carnegie Mellon University, Eberly Center. (n.d.a). What is the
difference between formative and summative assessment? https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/formative-summative.html
Carnegie Mellon University, Eberly Center. (n.d.b). Why should
assessments, learning objectives, and instructional strategies be aligned? https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/alignment.html
Carvalho, B. (2020, May 4). What is
a portfolio for the classroom? https://spacesedu.com/en/what-is-a-portfolio-for-the-classroom/
Collins, J. (2021, April 19). DIY
guide to writing good multiple-choice questions. https://thereadingroom.mrionline.com/2021/04/diy-guide-to-writing-good-multiple-choice-questions/
Collier, K. (2025, July 10). Empowering
students through effective feedback. https://www.edutopia.org/article/effective-feedback-strategies-elementary-students/
Common Core State Standards Initiative.
(n.d.a). Frequently asked questions. https://www.thecorestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/
Common Core State Standards Initiative.
(n.d.b). Myths vs. facts. https://www.thecorestandards.org/about-the-standards/myths-vs-facts/
Conley, D. T. (2014, October). A new
era for educational assessment. Students at the Center:
Deeper Learning Research Series. Jobs for the Future. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559683.pdf
Dame, B., & Lea, K. (2020, May 29).
Using universal design to create better assessments. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-universal-design-create-better-assessments
Deubel, P. (2022). Standardized test
preparation and tips for success. Computing Technology for Math Excellence.
http://www.ct4me.net/standardized_test_preparation.htm
Dyer, K., & Rodriguez, M. (2026). 75
digital tools and apps teachers can use to support formative assessment in the
classroom. https://www.nwea.org/blog/2024/75-digital-tools-apps-teachers-use-to-support-classroom-formative-assessment/
EduNova. (n.d.) True/False tests. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-019-0169-0
Georgia Association of Educators.
(2024). Code of ethics for educators. https://www.gapsc.com/Ethics/CodeOfEthics.aspx
Huynh, T. (2023). Making assessments
more equitable for multilingual learners. https://www.edutopia.org/article/making-assessments-equitable-multilingual-students/
IRIS Center
for Training Enhancements. (2004). Classroom assessment (part 1): An
introduction to monitoring academic achievement in the classroom. http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/gpm/
Kansas State University.
(2015). Is this a trick question? http://www.k-state.edu/ksde/alp/resources/Handout-Module6.pdf
Lewis, L. (2025). 24 formative
assessment examples to add to daily lessons. https://www.formative.com/read/formative-assessment-examples
Luke, S. D., Schwartz, A.
(2007). Assessment & accommodations. https://dev.successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Assessment-Accommodations-NICYC.pdf
Marco Learning. (2025). Importance
of validity and reliability in classroom assessments. https://marcolearning.com/the-two-keys-to-quality-testing-reliability-and-validity/
National Foundation for Educational
Research. (n.d.). Assessment. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/key-topics-expertise/assessment/
New York State Education Department.
(2025). 2025 grades 3–8 ELA, math, and science test manuals. https://www.nysed.gov/state-assessment/archive-2025-grades-3-8-ela-math-and-science-test-manuals
Noel, W. (2024). Formative vs. summative
assessment: 7 differences to know. https://www.formative.com/read/formative-vs-summative?_rid=jrge5s
Orr, R., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., &
Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and using learning objectives. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073
Pappas, C. (2025). 10 best practices
for writing multiple choice questions in elearning.
https://elearningindustry.com/best-practices-writing-multiple-choice-questions-elearning
Polat, M. (2020). Analysis of
multiple-choice versus open-ended questions in language tests according to
different cognitive domain levels. Novitas-ROYAL,
14(2), 76–96. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1272114.pdf
Resilient Educator. (2020). Summative
assessment: What teachers need to know. https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/summative-assessment-what-teachers-need-to-know/
Sideris, C. (2025). A guide
to different types of assessment questions. https://agolix.com/blog/a-guide-to-different-types-of-assessment-questions/
Sood, A. (2025). How to choose the
right assessment questions. https://learnexperts.ai/blog/choose-right-assessment-questions/
Sparks, S. D. (2018). Getting feedback
right: A Q&A with John Hattie. Education
Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2018/06/20/getting-feedback-right-a-qa-with-john.html
Strauss, V. (2021, April 5). Why the
Common Core standards failed—And what it means for school reform. Washington
Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/04/05/common-core-failed-school-reform/
Sunburst Digital Learning. (2022). The
rise of online testing: how better typing could improve test scores. https://www.typetolearn.app/news-and-articles/online-testing-teaching-typing-could-improve-test-scores/
TEAL Center.
(2012) Metacognitive processes. American Institutes for Research. https://lincs.ed.gov/state-resources/federal-initiatives/teal/guide/metacognitive#:~:text=4%3AMetacognitiveProcesses,-FacebookLinkedInTwitter&text=Metacognitionisone'sabilityto,modifyone'sapproachasneeded.
The Core Collaborative Learning Lab.
(2025). Empowering students through growth portfolios. https://thecorecollaborative.com/empowering-students-through-growth-portfolios/
Thomas, A. (2025). the cost of
standardized testing: How a single metric is failing our students. https://circeinstitute.org/blog/the-cost-of-standardized-testing-how-a-single-metric-is-failing-our-students/
Ujifusa, A. (2021). Map: Tracking the common core state standards. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/section/multimedia/map-states-academic-standards-common-core-or.html
UNESCO. (n.d.). Assessment for
improved learning outcomes. https://www.unesco.org/en/learning-assessments
Warner, M. (2025). Building student
ownership through portfolios and student-led conferences. https://www.nwea.org/blog/2025/building-student-ownership-through-portfolios-and-student-led-conferences/
Welcome, A. (2021, November 23). Learning
gaps: Types, examples, and tips to solve them. https://sphero.com/blogs/news/learning-gaps
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., &
Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of
educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Wooclap. (2025, September 29). Formative assessment in practice:
The complete guide for teachers in 2025. https://www.wooclap.com/en/blog/formative-assessment/
Wood, K. D., & Taylor, D. B. (2020).
Smuggling writing: Strategies that get
students to write every day in every content area. Corwin.
World Population Review. (2026). Common
Core states 2026. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/common-core-states
Wu, J., and Yu, X. (2025). The influence
of formative assessment on academic performance: exploring the role of
teachers' emotional support. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567615
Course content is updated
every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be
active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the
command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find
whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding
organization’s web home page.
5/28/26 jn