Inclusion:
Working
with Students with Special Needs
in General Education Classrooms
Instructor Name: Dr. Karen Lea
Phone: 509-891-7219
Office Hours: 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday–Friday
Email: karen_lea@virtualeduc.com
Address: Virtual Education Software
23403 E Mission Avenue, Suite 220F
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Technical Support: support@virtualeduc.com
Inclusion: Working with Students with
Special Needs in General Education Classrooms was written to help teachers understand concepts and terms
related to educating students in inclusive classrooms. The course also helps
teachers learn about the continuum of placements school systems can use in
providing special education and related services to students with disabilities.
Information discussed is also designed to help you understand the federal
definition of students entitled to special education services, as well as
procedures you can use in determining whether these students can be educated in
the regular classroom. The course also identifies and describes the roles and
responsibilities of special and general educators in providing special
education services to students educated in inclusive classrooms and
instructional and classroom management strategies teachers can use to work with
these students in the least restrictive environment.
This computer-based
instruction course is a self-supporting program that provides instruction,
structured practice, and evaluation all on your home or school computer.
Technical support information can be found in the Help section of your course.
Title: Inclusion: Working
with Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms
Publisher:
Virtual Education Software, inc.
2002, Revised 2010, Revised 2015, Revised 2017, Revised 2020, Revised 2024
Instructor: Dr. Karen Lea
The structure and format
of most distance-learning courses presume a high level of personal and academic
integrity in completion and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a
distance-learning course are expected to adhere to the following standards of
academic conduct.
Academic work submitted
by the individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the
student’s own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its
correct source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials
as if they are one’s own work is unacceptable.
The individual will
encourage honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or
information to another person with knowledge that these materials or
information will be used improperly.
Violation
of these academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade
and subsequent loss of credit for the course.
This course is designed
as an informational course for K–12 regular and special education teachers,
administrators, parents, and related service personnel. Information
discussed is designed to help you better understand current educational models
being used to educate students with disabilities in the general education
classroom. This course will allow you to compare and identify how school
districts in your own area are implementing inclusion programs, handling
current inclusion issues, and some of the practices
teachers are using to educate students in inclusive settings.
As a result of taking this course, participants will be able
to demonstrate their ability to:
·
Explain federal law and
regulations and how these affect educators
·
Correctly use key terms
when communicating with a special education team and guardians
·
Use Response to
Intervention at an initial level
·
Identify characteristics
of special needs students
·
Apply strategies for
effective teaching, including classroom management
·
Choose appropriate
instructional and assessment accommodations and modifications
Information provided in
this course has been divided into five chapters, which should be completed in
the order in which they are presented in the program. Once you have completed
these five chapters, you should have a better understanding of the concept of
inclusion and how it came about. You are strongly encouraged to read additional
journal articles, books, and research materials outside the course material to
gain a better understanding of current issues related to educating students
with disabilities in inclusive classrooms.
This chapter focuses on federal
law and regulations, and key terms and concepts. This is foundational knowledge
for educators to understand their legal responsibility in teaching all students
with special needs. After reading information provided in this chapter, you
should be able to:
·
Describe the federal
definition of students with disabilities
·
Describe the criteria
school systems can use to determine whether a student falls under one of the
categories of disabilities
·
Describe key concepts/terms
·
List and describe federal
legislation and court cases that have contributed to the movement toward
educating students with disabilities in the classroom
·
List and describe the
continuum of settings school systems can use to educate students with disabilities
·
List and describe
characteristics of effective inclusion programs
·
List and describe the
advantages and disadvantages of inclusion
Chapter 2 focuses on the
federal laws and regulations. It is important that you understand these since
they do govern your school and your classroom. Reading and hearing about this
information can become overwhelming, so take your time moving through this
section. Having a good foundational knowledge of the laws and regulations will
help you apply strategies that will be discussed later in the course. After
reading the information provided in this chapter, you should be able to:
·
List and describe legal
procedures and criteria school systems and educators are required to use in
evaluating, identifying, and educating students with disabilities, and the
special education and related services needed;
·
List and describe the
provisions specified under IDEA, and the mandate each provision specifies
school systems must use in working with students with special needs;
·
List and describe the
provisions specified under federal regulations and procedures school systems
must use in working with students with special needs;
·
Describe the special
education and related services school systems are mandated to provide to
students with disabilities;
·
Describe the procedural
safeguards parents of students with disabilities are granted under IDEA;
·
Describe the civil rights
students with disabilities are granted under Section 504, and ADA;
·
Describe the purpose of
an Individualized Education Program (IEP) and an Individualized Family Service
Plan and the components or information that needs to be specified in each document;
·
List and describe the
similarities and differences between regulations for the various
education-related acts;
·
List and describe
procedures school systems are expected to go through at the pre-referral and
referral stages;
·
List and describe the
Response to Intervention (RTI) process, and procedures school systems are
expected to go through before a child is referred for an in-depth assessment,
for the purpose of determining whether he/she has a disability and/or is
labeled as a student with a specific learning disability;
·
Describe the roles and
responsibilities of teachers, school-based problem solving
team members, and the multidisciplinary (IEP) team in identifying and providing
special education and related services to students with special needs; and
·
Describe procedures
special and general educators can use to determine whether students with
disabilities can be educated in the general education classroom.
This chapter focuses on
the impact the movement toward educating students with special needs in the
general education classroom has had on the roles and responsibilities of
special and general educators, strategies teachers can use to work
collaboratively, and procedures teachers can use to determine whether students
need accommodations and modifications. After reading information provided in
this chapter, you should be able to:
·
Describe the impact the
movement toward educating students with special needs in the general education
classroom has had on teachers;
·
Describe the role and
responsibilities of teachers in terms of educating students with disabilities
in inclusive classrooms;
·
Define the term
“collaboration” and describe different collaborative models special and general
educators can use to provide special education and related services to students
educated in general education classrooms (e.g. co-teaching);
·
List and describe
characteristics that must be in place for special and general educators to
collaborate successfully; and
·
List and describe the
steps special and general educators should go through in setting up their own
collaborative efforts.
Chapter four focuses on
why special and general educators need to differentiate instruction and provide
instructional and assessment accommodations and modifications for students
educated in inclusive classrooms. After reading the information provided in
this chapter, you should be able to:
·
Specify regulations that
mandate that students should be provided with adaptations;
·
Define the terms
“differentiated instruction,” “curricular adaptations,” “accommodations,” and
“modifications”;
·
List and describe
instructional accommodations and modifications teachers can provide to students
educated in inclusive classrooms;
·
List and describe the
steps special and general educators can use to determine accommodations and
modifications students may require in inclusive classrooms;
·
Describe steps special
and general educators can go through in determining whether a student will or
will not participate in state- or district-wide assessment programs; and
·
List and describe types
of assessment accommodations teachers can provide for students during testing.
Chapter five focuses on
procedures special and general educators can use to structure their classroom
environment and manage students’ behaviors. After reading information provided
in this chapter, you should be able to:
·
List and describe factors
that may result in students’ inappropriate classroom behavior;
·
Define “functional
assessment” and describe procedures educators can use to evaluate their
classroom setting;
·
List and describe
strategies educators can use to structure their classroom setting and increase
students’ appropriate classroom behavior and decrease inappropriate classroom
behavior; and
·
List and describe the
importance of identifying the relationship between students’ behaviors and
learning.
As a student you will be
expected to:
·
Complete all four information sections showing a
competent understanding of the material presented in each section.
·
Complete all four section examinations, showing a
competent understanding of the material presented. You must obtain an overall
score of 70% or higher, with no
individual exam score below 50%, and
successfully complete ALL writing assignments to pass this course. *Please
note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university;
therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your
minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete a review of any
section on which your examination score was below 50%.
·
Retake any examination,
after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a
minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a
minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please
note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university;
therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your
minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete all course
journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word count shown
for each writing assignment.
·
Complete a course
evaluation form at the end of the course.
At the end of each course
section, you will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess
your knowledge. You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last
score will save, not the highest score. After your third attempt, each examination
will lock and not allow further access. The average from your exam scores will be printed on your certificate.
However, this is not your final grade since your required writing assignments
have not been reviewed. Exceptionally written or poorly written required
writing assignments, or violation of the academic integrity policy in the
course syllabus, will affect your grade. As this is a self-paced computerized
instruction program, you may review course information as often as necessary.
You will not be able to exit any examinations until you have answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam before you complete
all questions, your information will be lost. You are expected to complete the
entire exam in one sitting.
All assignments are reviewed and may impact your final grade. Exceptionally or poorly written assignments, or violation of
the Academic Integrity Policy (see course syllabus for policy), will affect
your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is determined by your writing
assignments, and your overall exam score determines the other fifty percent. Refer
to the Essay Grading Guidelines,
which were sent as an attachment with your original course link. You should also refer to the Course Syllabus
Addendum, which was sent as an attachment with your original course link, to
determine if you have any writing assignments in addition to the Critical
Thinking Questions (CTQ) and Journal Article Summations (JAS). If you do, the
Essay Grading Guidelines will also
apply.
Your writing assignments
must meet the minimum word count and are not to include the question or your
final citations as part of your word count. In other words, the question and
citations are not to be used as a means to meet the
minimum word count.
There are four CTQs that you are required to complete. You
will need to write a minimum of 500 words (maximum 1,000) per essay. You should
explain how the information that you gained from the course will be applied and
clearly convey a strong understanding of the course content as it relates to
each CTQ. To view the questions, click on REQUIRED ESSAY and choose the CTQ
that you are ready to complete; this will bring up a screen where you may enter
your essay. Prior to course submission, you may go back at any point to edit
your essay, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with
your edits.
You must click SAVE before you write another essay or move
on to another part of the course.
You are required to write, in your own words, a summary on a
total of three peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles (one article per
JAS), written by an author with a Ph.D., Ed.D. or similar, on the topic
outlined within each JAS section in the “Required Essays” portion of the course
(blogs, abstracts, news articles, or similar are not acceptable). Your article
choice must relate specifically to the discussion topic listed in each
individual JAS. You will choose a total of three relevant articles (one article
per JAS) and write a thorough summary of the information presented in each
article (you must write a minimum of 200 words with a 400
word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the journal name,
volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the facilitator to
access and review each article.
To write your summary, click on REQUIRED ESSAYS and choose
the JAS that you would like to complete. A writing program will automatically
launch where you can write your summary. When you are ready to stop, click SAVE. Prior to course submission you
may go back at any point to edit your summaries but
you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits. For
more information on the features of this assignment, please consult the HELP
menu.
You must click SAVE before you write another summary or move
on to another part of the course.
Karen Lea holds a Ph.D.
in education. Dr. Lea has fifteen years’ experience teaching at the K–12 level
and another fourteen years’ experience teaching education courses at the
undergraduate and post-graduate level. Currently she is a Lead Program
Development Owner at Western Governor’s University. Dr. Lea has been
professionally published over fifteen times and has served on over a dozen
panels and boards, including serving on the NCATE (CAEP) Board of Examiners.
You may contact the
instructor by emailing karen_lea@virtualeduc.com or by calling 509-891-7219 Monday
through Friday. Calls made during office hours will be answered within 24
hours. Phone conferences will be limited to ten minutes per student, per day,
given that this is a self-paced instructional program. Please do not contact
the instructor about technical problems, course glitches, or other issues that
involve the operation of the course.
If you have questions or
problems related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice.
If the problem persists please check our support pages for FAQs and known
issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of your
course.
If you need personal assistance then email support@virtualeduc.com or call 509-891-7219. When contacting
technical support, please know your course version number (it is located at the
bottom left side of the Welcome Screen) and your operating
system, and be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call.
Please refer to VESi’s
website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further
questions about the compatibility of your operating system.
Refer to the addendum regarding
Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be Submitted, and how
to submit your completed information. The addendum will also note any
additional course assignments that you may be required to complete that are not
listed in this syllabus.
ADA.gov. (n.d.). The Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/
Adelson,
J. L., Barton, E., Bradshaw, C., Bryant, B., Bryant, D., Cook, B. G., Coyne,
M., DeBettencourt, L., DeHaven, A. C., Dymond, S., Esposito, J., Farmer, T.,
Flake, J. K., Gage, N. A., Kern, L., Lane, K. L., Lee, D., Lembke, E., Levine,
F., … Troia, G. A. (2023). A roadmap for transparent research in special
education and related disciplines. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sqfy3
American
Psychiatric Association. (2021). What is intellectual disability? https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/intellectual-disability/what-is-intellectual-disability
Andreasen,
J. K. (2023). School-based mentor teachers as
boundary-crossers in an initial teacher education partnership. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103960
Barthelemess, C. (2022, October 11). 5 common
types of classroom accommodations for students with disabilities. https://educationadvanced.com/resources/blog/5-common-types-of-classroom-accommodations-for-students-with-disabilities/
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
CHADD. (n.d.). Section 504. https://chadd.org/for-parents/section-504/
Chandler, L., & Dahlquist, C. (2021).
Functional assessment: Strategies to
prevent and remediate challenging behaviors in school settings (4th ed.).
Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Council for Exceptional Children.
(2015). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines
for special education: Professional ethics and standards. Council
for Exceptional Children. https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/Standards%20for%20Professional%20Practice.pdf
Crockett, J. B., & Martin E. W. (2024). Envisioning
an optimistic future for special education. Exceptionality: A Special
Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2024.2300193
Cummings,
E. (2023). How
to apply structured instruction in a Special Education classroom. Behaviorist. https://www.behaviorist.com/how-to-implement-structured-instruction-in-a-special-education-classroom/
Department of Education. (2023). Non-regulatory
guidance: Using evidence to strengthen education investments. https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/about/discretionary/2023-non-regulatory-guidance-evidence.pdf
Emmer, E., & Evertson, C. (2016). Classroom management for middle and high
school teachers (10th ed.). Allyn
& Bacon.
Evertson, C., & Emmer, E. (2012). Classroom management for elementary teachers
(9th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Flick, G. (2011). Understanding and managing emotional and behavioral disorders in the
classroom (1st ed.). Merrill
Prentice-Hall.
Friend, M. (2018). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals (4th
ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2017). Interactions: Collaboration skills for
school professionals (8th ed.). Merrill
Prentice-Hall.
Garguilo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C.
(2017). Instructional strategies for students with mild, moderate, and
severe intellectual disability. Sage.
Gargiulo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C.
(2019). Special education in contemporary society (7th ed.). Sage.
Hallahan, D., Kauffman, J., &
Pullen, P. (2018). Exceptional learners:
Introduction to special education (14th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Heward, W. (2017). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (11th
ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Individuals With Disabilities Education
Act (n.d.), 20, U.S.C §1400 et seq. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/about-idea/
Kerr, M., & Nelson, C. (2010). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classrooms (6th
ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Let's Go Learn. (n.d.). Special education assessments &
instruction. https://www.letsgolearn.com/resources/special-education-topics/
Levin, J., & Nolan, J. (2013). Principles of classroom management: A professional decision-making
model (7th ed.). Allyn
& Bacon.
Marx,
T. (2016). How can ESSA help students with disabilities? American
Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/resource/how-can-essa-help-students-disabilities
Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (2017). Inclusive
classrooms: The strategies for effective instruction (6th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
McLeskey, J., Barringer, M-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell,
M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L.,
Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017, January). High-leverage
practices in special education: Collaboration: Research syntheses. https://highleveragepractices.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Collaborationfinal.pdf
Mercer, C., & Mercer, A. (2011). Teaching students with learning
problems (8th ed.). Merrill
Prentice-Hall.
Melillo, G. (2022, September 16). Students with
disabilities fare better when integrated into gen-ed classrooms. Changing
America. https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/education/3646255-students-with-disabilities-fare-better-when-integrated-into-gen-ed-classrooms/#:~:text=In%20tenth%20grade%2C%20those%20in,students%20in%20low%2Dinclusion%20settings
Murdick, N., Gartin, B., & Crabtree, T. (2021). Special education law (3rd ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
National Association of
School Psychologists. (n.d.). ESSA and multitiered systems of support for
decision-makers. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/relevant-law/the-every-student-succeeds-act/essa-implementation-resources/essa-and-mtss-for-decision-makers
National Council on
Disability. (2018). Every Student Succeeds Act and students with disabilities. https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_ESSA-SWD_Accessible.pdf
Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon
School District, 801 F.Supp.1392 (D.N.J. 1992).
Polloway, E., Patton, J., & Serna, L. (2022).
Strategies
for teaching learners with special needs (10th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Project IDEAL. (2017). Other health
impairments. http://www.projectidealonline.org/v/health-impairments/
Rowe, D. A., Bleins. M., &
Walker, V. (2023). Supporting inclusive practices in the least restrictive
environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599231156042
Sacramento City Unified School District v. Holland, 786
F.Supp.874 (E.D. Cal. 1992).
Sallam, M. S. (2023). How
MTSS and UDL frameworks can be used to reach all learners and reduce
unnecessary special education evaluations [Master’s
Thesis]. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/1034/
Salend, S. (2015). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices
(8th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Shepard, T. (2010). Working with students with emotional and
behavioral disorders: Characteristics and teaching strategies (1st ed).
Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Turnbull, A., Turnbull, H., Erwin, E., Soodak, L., & Shogren, K. (2014). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through
partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Turnbull, A., Turnbull, H., &
Wehmeyer, M. (2012). Exceptional lives:
Special education in today’s schools (7th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (2020). Strategies for teaching
students with learning and behavior problems (10th ed.). Pearson.
Vaughn, S., Bos, C., & Schumm, J. (2017). Teaching
students who are exceptional, diverse, and at-risk in the general education
classroom (7th ed.). Merrill
Prentice-Hall.
Voltz, D. L. (2019). Diversity issues and the special
education teaching force: Advancing the discussion. Remedial and Special
Education, 40(4), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518792664
Wheeler, J., & Richey, D. (2019). Behavior management: Principles and practices of positive behavior
supports (4th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Yell, M. L. (2018). The law and
special education (5th ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
Yell, M., Shriner, J., Meadows, N.,
& Drasgow, E. (2013). Evidence-based practices for educating students with emotional and
behavioral disorders (2nd ed.). Merrill
Prentice-Hall.
Course content is updated
every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be
active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the
command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find
whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding
organization’s web home page.
5/8/24 JN