Educational Technology:
Effective
Use of Technology in the Classroom
Instructor Name: Dr. Jamie Rhoads
Phone: 1-800-313-6744
Office Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday –
Friday
Email: jamie_rhoads@virtualeduc.com
Address: Virtual Education Software
23403 E Mission Avenue, Suite
220F
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Technical Support: support@virtualeduc.com
Technology
integration doesn’t have to be hard. In fact, it should be easy! Regardless of
your skill level, this course will walk you through innovative technology that
will inspire your creativity and elevate the way you share information and
ideas. Students will learn how to select and evaluate technology tools to align
to current curriculum. You will gain knowledge and skill to effectively pursue
professional growth in educational technology. Through discovery, reflection,
and analysis you will realize practical applications of interactive digital
tools. You will have the opportunity to explore easy to learn internet-based
multimedia that can be integrated inside and outside of the classroom. This
course will also provide pathways for you to improve your practice through
self-reflection. You will leave with a toolbox of strategies and ideas to
transform everyday content into extraordinary products.
After you have completed your studies
in the chapters on educational technology in the classroom, you will be
presented with various classroom scenarios in which you will be able to
practice and hone your skills for creating a digital culture, integrating practical
strategies based on standards, and implementing
educational technology in your classroom.
Title: Educational Technology:
Effective Use of Technology in the Classroom
Publisher: Virtual Education Software, inc. 2024
Instructor: Dr. Jamie Rhoads
The structure and format of most distance-learning
courses presume a high level of personal and academic integrity in completion
and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a distance-learning
course are expected to adhere to the following standards of academic conduct.
Academic work submitted by the
individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the student’s
own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct
source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if
they are one’s own work is unacceptable.
The individual will encourage honesty
in others by refraining from providing materials or information to another
person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used
improperly.
Violations of these
academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade and
subsequent loss of credit for the course.
This course is designed to be an
informational course with application to work or work-related settings. The types
of educational technology, tools, and strategies introduced are designed to be
used in any educational classroom but are best suited for elementary and
secondary students.
As
a result of this course, participants will demonstrate their ability to:
1.
Recognize
the importance of technology in today’s classroom.
2.
Identify
key concepts and important components of educational technology.
3.
Review
the history of educational technology as it relates to current theory and
practice.
4.
Evaluate
your awareness and level technology integration.
5.
Discuss
the benefits of integrating technology in and out of a classroom.
6.
Examine
best practices and recognize how technology, pedagogy, and content can enhance
learning outcomes.
7.
Use
self-reflection to propose professional goals to improve your practice in
technology integration.
8.
Explain
the ways in which digital culture is supported and influenced by ethics.
9.
Describe
the Digital Age and the teacher’s role in it.
10. Recognize
concepts and important components of digital literacy.
11. Adapt
ethical guidelines and examples that you can apply to your teaching.
12. Recall the
ISTE standards and how they are significant to technology integration.
13. Identify
types, tools, and strategies that can be used to create innovative products.
14. Acquire
educational technology strategies that if used correctly, can increase student
communication, motivation, engagement achievement.
15. Apply your
learning by creating a lesson plan utilizing a selected technology tool or strategy.
16. Successfully
evaluate educational technology tools to enhance teaching and learning.
17. Identify
practical ways to elevate your skill set and effectively integrate technology.
18. Examine how
the global pandemic has changed education and student needs.
19. Articulate
how online learning impacted the world before, during, and after the pandemic.
20. Explain
common barriers to effective online courses and strategies that can overcome
them.
The course, Educational Technology, has been divided into four chapters. The
first two chapters, Introduction to Educational Technology and Digital Literacy,
provide foundational concepts that must be considered to effectively integrate
technology into your classroom. The first chapter encompasses the historical
significance, key concepts and components, and benefits of educational
technology. Focusing on the transformative
role of technology in modern education, the chapter discusses advantages and
challenges in teaching and learning. The chapter concludes with an activity
that guides learners on identifying professional goals. Chapter two gives
learners an in-depth review and discussion on the Digital Age. Understanding
the impact technology has had on the world, and specifically education, gives
teachers the competence and confidence to navigate rapid change. Practical tips for safeguarding online security,
distinguishing between reliable and misleading content, and leveraging
technology for creative expression converge to shape a holistic understanding
of digital literacy. There are twenty-four subject areas in these two
chapters, which are sequential and should be completed in the order in which
they are presented in the course. After completing these twenty-four areas you
should understand the importance of technology in today’s classroom, including
the essential task to learn and teach digital literacy
skills.
In Chapter three you will learn
practical skills to assist you in integrating technology into your classroom.
The chapter identifies
specific educational technology tools and strategies to increase
student communication, motivation, and engagement achievement. Also included
are several future trends. Teachers should be aware of the benefits and
questions surrounding new tools including how to evaluate new tools. The course
concludes with a discussion on the changing landscape of educational
technology. Chapter four reviews the impact the pandemic had on student needs
and how education is changing in response. One of the biggest challenges for
teachers and students during and after the pandemic has been online learning. Recognizing
that this technology is here to stay, this chapter focuses on how to minimize stress
and barriers of online learning to create quality online experiences. There are twenty-two subject areas in chapters three and
four; they are sequential and should be completed in the order in which they
are presented in the course. After completing these twenty-two areas, you
should be able to compare educational technology tools and strategies and
select the most effective ways to enhance your practice and classroom.
After completing each chapter, you will
be required to take an examination.
As
a student, you will be expected to:
·
Complete all four information sections showing a
competent understanding of the material presented in each section.
·
Complete all four section examinations, showing a
competent understanding of the material presented. You must obtain an overall
score of 70% or higher, with no
individual exam score below 50%, and
successfully complete ALL writing assignments to pass this course. *Please
note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university;
therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your
minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete a review of any
section on which your examination score was below 50%.
·
Retake any examination,
after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a
minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a
minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please
note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university;
therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your
minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete all course
journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word count shown
for each writing assignment.
·
Complete a course
evaluation form at the end of the course.
1.
Course
Description
2.
Chapter
Introduction
3.
Defining
and Recognizing Technology
4.
Five
Domains
5.
History
and Impact of Educational Technology
6.
The
Path to Integration
7.
Research
8.
Technological
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
9.
Substitution,
Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR)
10. Technology
Integration Matrix (TIM)
11. Important
Considerations
12. Decreasing
Resistance- Understanding Problems Using the Iceberg Model
13. Decreasing
Resistance- Seven Essential Conditions
14. Decreasing
Resistance- Community of Learners
15. Decreasing
Resistance- Using Data
16. Decreasing
Resistance- Interprofessional Teams
17. Decreasing
Resistance- Becoming a Change Agent
18. Professional
Goals through Currere
1.
The
Digital Age
2.
Digital
Literacy
3.
The
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)
4.
ISTE
Student Standards
5.
ISTE
Standards for Educators
6.
Ethics
and Netiquette
7.
Concerns
and Issues
8.
The
Digital Divide
9.
Evaluating
Educational Technology
1.
Introduction
2.
Educational
Technology Integration
3.
Communication
4.
Engagement
5.
Achievement
6.
Future
Trends
7.
Case
Study Examples
8.
Feedback
and Data
9.
Integration
Ideas
1.
Chapter
Introduction
2.
Impacts
of the Global Pandemic
3.
Online
Education
4.
History
of Online Education
5.
Learning
Management System (LMS)
6.
Research
and Research Gap
7.
Frameworks
of Quality
8.
Barriers
and Opportunities
9.
Feedback
10. Technology
11. Interaction
12. Structure
13. Community
At the end of each course chapter, you
will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess your knowledge.
You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last score will save, not
the highest score. After your third attempt, each examination will lock and not allow further access. The average from your
exam scores will be printed on your certificate (your graded scenario scores
are not included in this average). However, this is not your final grade since
your required writing assignments have not been reviewed. Exceptionally written
or poorly written required writing assignments, or violation of the academic
integrity policy in the course syllabus, will affect your grade. As this is a
self-paced computerized instruction program, you may review course information
as often as necessary. You will not be able to exit any examinations until you
have answered all questions. If you try to exit the
exam before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are
expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.
All assignments are reviewed and may impact
your final grade. Exceptionally or poorly
written assignments, or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy (see course
syllabus for policy), will affect your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is
determined by your writing assignments, and your overall exam score determines
the other fifty percent. Refer to the Essay Grading Guidelines, which were sent as an attachment with your
original course link. You should also
refer to the Course Syllabus Addendum, which was sent as an attachment with
your original course link, to determine if you have any writing assignments in
addition to the Critical Thinking Questions (CTQ) and Journal Article Summations
(JAS). If you do, the Essay Grading Guidelines will also apply.
Your writing assignments must meet the
minimum word count and are not to include the question or your final citations
as part of your word count. In other words, the question and citations are not
to be used as a means to meet the minimum word count.
There are four CTQs that
you are required to complete. You will need to write a minimum of 500 words
(maximum 1,000) per essay. You should explain how the information that you gained
from the course will be applied and clearly convey a strong understanding of
the course content as it relates to each CTQ. To view the questions, click on
REQUIRED ESSAY and choose the CTQ that you are ready to complete; this will
bring up a screen where you may enter your essay. Prior to course submission,
you may go back at any point to edit your essay, but you must be certain to
click SAVE once you are done with your edits.
You must click SAVE
before you write another essay or move on to another part of the course.
You are required to
write, in your own words, a summary on a total of three peer-reviewed or
scholarly journal articles (one article per JAS), written by an author with a
Ph.D., Ed.D. or similar, on the topic outlined within each JAS section in the
“Required Essays” portion of the course (blogs, abstracts, news articles, or
similar are not acceptable). Your article choice must relate specifically to
the discussion topic listed in each individual JAS. You will choose a total of
three relevant articles (one article per JAS) and write a thorough summary of
the information presented in each article (you must write a minimum of 200
words with a 400-word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the
journal name, volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the
facilitator to access and review each article.
To write your summary,
click on REQUIRED ESSAYS and choose the JAS that you would like to complete. A
writing program will automatically launch where you can write your summary.
When you are ready to stop, click SAVE.
Prior to course submission you may go back at any point to edit your summaries but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are
done with your edits. For more information on the features of this assignment,
please consult the HELP menu.
You must click SAVE
before you write another summary or move on to another part of the course.
Educational Technology was
originally developed by Professor Jamie Rhoads. Dr. Rhoads has over 20 years of
experience with professional backgrounds in K–12 and higher education,
educational technology, instructional design, online learning, and curriculum
development. Professor Rhoads is a Director of Instructional Design and an
adjunct faculty member specialized in quality assurance, assessment strategies,
data analysis, strategic plans, and multimedia and educational tool evaluation,
selection, and recommendations. They hold a bachelor’s degree in education, a
master’s degree in Instructional Technology, and a doctorate in
Interprofessional Leadership. Dr. Rhoads’ current research areas focus on
understanding the student and teacher perspective of quality experiences and how
that knowledge can lead to better designed curriculum.
You may contact the instructor by
emailing Professor Rhoads at jamie_rhoads@virtualeduc.com or calling them at 1-800-313-6744, Monday through Friday,
8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. PST. Phone messages will be answered within 24 hours. Phone conferences will be limited to
ten minutes per student, per day, given that this is a self-paced instructional
program. Please do not contact the instructor about technical problems, course
glitches, or other issues that involve the operation of the course.
If you have questions or problems
related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the
problem persists please check our support pages for
FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help
section of your course.
If you need personal assistance
then email support@virtualeduc.com or call 509-891-7219. When contacting technical support,
please know your course version number (it is located at the bottom left side
of the Welcome Screen) and your operating system, and
be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call.
Please refer to VESi’s website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further questions about the
compatibility of your operating system.
Refer to the addendum
regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be
Submitted, and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also
note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete
that are not listed in this syllabus.
Agar, J. (2019). What is
technology? Annals of Science, 77(3), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2019.1672788
Ahmadigol, J. (2016). What is educational technology, anyway? A
commentary on the new AECT definition of the field. Canadian Journal of
Learning and Technology, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/t2n88p
Alexander,
M. E., Commander, N., Greenberg, D., & Ward, T. (2010). Using the
four-question techniques to enhance critical thinking in online discussions. MERLOT
Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 409–415.
Basham, J. D., Gardner,
J. E., & Smith, S. J. (2020). Measuring the implementation of UDL in
classrooms and schools: Initial field test results. Remedial and Special
Education, 41(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520908015
Bigatel, P. M., &
Edel-Malizia, S. (2018). Using the ‘Indicators of Engaged Learning Online’
framework to evaluate online course quality. TechTrends:
Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 62(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0239-4
British Computer Society. (2018). Digital
literacy and employability. https://www.bcs.org/category/17854
Carr, R., & Hagel, P. (2012).
Students’ evaluations of teaching quality and their unit online activity: An
empirical investigation. In R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds.), Hello! Where are you in the landscape
of educational technology? Programs and abstracts for the 25th ascilite conference. Melbourne, Australia, November 30–December 3, 2008. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/melbourne08/procs/carr-r.pdf
Commission on
Instructional Technology. (1969, August). To improve learning: A report to
the President and the Congress of the United States.
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality
and educational accountability: The irony of ‘No Child Left Behind.’ Race
Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320701503207
Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic
creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80. http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm
Diep,
C., Nguyen, G., & Vo, N. (2021). Structure and procedure for developing an
online course. Journal of Technical Education Science, 62, 83–98.
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.62.2021.83
Dietz-Uhler,
B., & Lanter, J. R. (2009). Using the four-questions technique to enhance
learning. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802529327
Dixson,
M. D. (2015, July 30). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The
Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Everyday Speech. (n.d.).
The importance of teaching critical thinking in middle school: A comprehensive
guide. https://everydayspeech.com/sel-implementation/the-importance-of-teaching-critical-thinking-in-middle-school-a-comprehensive-guide/
Florida Center for
Instructional Technology. (n.d.). The Technology Integration Matrix. https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/
Friedman, T. L. (2007). The
world is flat 3.0: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Picador.
Gagne, R. M. (2013). Instructional
technology: Foundations. Routledge.
Garbett,
D., & Ovens, A. (Eds.). (2018). Being self-study researchers in a
digital world: Future oriented research and pedagogy in teacher education.
Springer.
Garrett,
R., Simunich, B., Legon, R., & Frederickson, E. (2022). Chloe 7:
Tracking online learning from mainstream acceptance to universal adoption.
Quality Matters & Eduventures Survey of Chief
Online Officers. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-7-Report-2022.pdf
Grant, K. (2018, March
6). 5 ways to drive professional learning the UDL
way. ISTE. https://iste.org/blog/5-ways-to-drive-professional-learning-the-udl-way
Great Schools
Partnership. (2016). Student engagement definition. In The glossary of education
reform. https://www.edglossary.org/student-engagement/
Guide 2 Research. (2020, June 30). 50
online education statistics: 2020 data on higher learning & corporate
training. Research.com. http://www.guide2research.com/research/online-education-statistics
Harrington,
C., & DeBruler, K. (2021). Key
strategies for engaging students in virtual learning environments.
Michigan Virtual University. https://michiganvirtual.org/research/publications/key-strategies-for-engaging-students-in-virtual-learning-environments/
Hemsing, K. (2012,
November 11). Technological vs digital literacy | ETEC540: Text,
Technologies—Community Weblog. https://blogs.ubc.ca/etec540sept12/2012/11/11/technological-vs-digital-literacy/
Hixon,
E., Buckenmeyer, J. A., & Barczyk, C. (2015). Closing the feedback loop:
Hearing the student voice in course quality. Quality Approaches in Higher
Education, 6(1), 26–36. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=O_9t-E8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=O_9t-E8AAAAJ:KlAtU1dfN6UC
ISTE [International
Society for Technology in Education]. ISTE standards: For educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators
ISTE [International
Society for Technology in Education]. ISTE standards: For students. https://iste.org/standards/students
Januszewski, A., &
Molenda, M. (Eds.). (2008). Educational technology (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kaste, M. (2010, July
26). Futurist 40 years later: Possibilities, not predictions. NPR. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128719212
King,
E. (1994). Goals 2000: Educate America Act. School Law Bulletin, 25(4),
15–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ499101
Koehler, M. J., &
Mishra, P. (2009). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)
for educators. Routledge.
Lestari, S., &
Santoso, A. (2019). The roles of digital literacy, technology literacy,
and human literacy to encourage work readiness of accounting education students
in the Fourth Industrial Revolution era. KnE Social Sciences, 3(11),
513–527. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i11.4031
Leung, T.
I., de Azevedo Cardoso, T., Mavragani, A., & Eysenbach, G. (2023, August 31). Best practices for using
AI tools as an author, peer reviewer, or editor. Journal of Medical Internet
Research, 25. https://doi.org/10.2196/51584
Lukic, D. (2022, April
15). Internet security: How to protect your online privacy. IDStrong. https://www.idstrong.com/sentinel/internet-privacy-security/
McGorry,
S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher
Education, 6(2), 159–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(03)00022-8
Milheim,
K. (Ed.). (2017). Cultivating diverse online classrooms through effective
instructional design. IGI Global.
Mort,
P. R. (1953). Educational adaptability. School Executive, 71, 1–23.
Muller,
K., Scalzo, K., Pickett, A., Dugan, L., Dubue, L.,
Simiele, D., McCabe, R., & Petz, Q. (2020). Ensuring online learning
quality: Perspectives from the State University of New York. Online Learning
Journal, 24(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2004
National Cybersecurity
Alliance. (2023). Online safety basics. National Cybersecurity Alliance.
https://staysafeonline.org/resources/online-safety-basics/
Noah, T. (2022, September
1). A handy framework for choosing edtech. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/handy-framework-choosing-edtech/
Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student
performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from
2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007
Pinar,
W. F. (1975). The method of currere. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Washington, DC, April 1975. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED104766.pdf
Pool,
C. R. (1997). A new digital literacy: A
conversation with Paul Gilster. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/a-new-digital-literacy-a-conversation-with-paul-gilster
Quality
Matters. (2020). Specific review standards
from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric, seventh edition. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf
Ralston-Berg,
P., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C., & Hixon, E. (2015). Students’ perceptions
of online course quality: How do they measure up to the research? Internet
Learning, 4(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.18278/il.4.1.2
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusions of
innovations (5th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
Roldan, G. (2023, July 20). Why “soft
skills” or “people skills” are so important for professionals (with some
examples to understand them better!). https://medium.com/@george.roldan.sarmiento/why-soft-skills-or-people-skills-are-so-important-for-professionals-with-some-examples-to-aa5682dffaf4
Scribd. (n.d.). Nurturing creativity
and fostering innovation: Catalysts for progress and success. https://www.scribd.com/document/655761694/Nurturing-Creativity-and-Fostering-Innovation-Catalysts-for-Progress-and-Success
Shattuck, G. (2010). Understanding
school leaders’ role in teachers’ adoption of technology integration classroom
practices. In M. Orey, S. A. Jones, & R. Maribe Branch (Eds.), Educational
media and technological yearbook (pp. 7–28). Springer.
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J.
R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of
useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education,
7(1), 59–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/102596/
Stauffer,
B. (2022). What are 21st century skills? iCEV
and Applied Educational Systems. https://www.aeseducation.com/blog/what-are-21st-century-skills
Swan,
K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction
and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education,
22(2), 306–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Taylor, K. (2023, August
16). The digital divide: What it is, and what’s being done to close it. https://www.investopedia.com/the-digital-divide-5116352
Teach
Online. (2020, June 17). Ten guiding principles for the use of technology in
learning. https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/how-use-technology-effectively/ten-guiding-principles-use-technology-learning
Terra, J. (2023, October
10). What is technology literacy? https://www.simplilearn.com/what-is-technology-literacy-article
Thornton,
M. (2017). Elementary pedagogy and instructional technology:
Action research on instructional
practices with technology integration in the elementary classroom
(Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/32906/
Vonderwell, S., Selma, X., & Alderman, K.
(2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal
of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ768879.pdf
Websites
Instructional
Design Frameworks. https://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/
OpenAI.
https://openai.com/
TeachOnline. https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/how-use-technology-effectively/ten-guiding-principles-use-technology-learning
National
Cybersecurity Alliance. https://staysafeonline.org/
21st
century. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
Blooms
Taxonomy. https://ictresourcesite.wordpress.com/blooms-taxonomy/
United
Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Professional Organizations
Association
for Educational Communications and Technology. https://www.aect.org/
International
Society for Technology in Education. https://iste.org/
Frameworks of Quality
Online
Course Construction and Evaluation Rubric. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1055643.pdf
Online
Learning Consortium. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/about/quality-framework-five-pillars/
Indicators
of Engaged Learning Online (IELO). https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.psu.edu/dist/b/55810/files/2016/06/Indicators-of-Engaged-Learning-Online.pdf
UDL
Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/research-evidence
Quality
Matters. https://www.qualitymatters.org/reviews-certifications/course-design-reviews
Course content is updated
every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be
active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the
command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find
whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding
organization’s web home page.
6/27/24 jn