Teaching
Secondary Math Conceptually:
Meeting
Mathematics Standards
Instructor Name: |
Kim Chappell, Ed.D. |
Phone: |
509-891-7219 |
Office Hours: |
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday – Friday |
Email: |
|
Address: |
Virtual Education Software |
|
23403 E Mission Avenue, Suite 220F |
|
Liberty Lake, WA 99019 |
Technical Support: |
Welcome to Teaching
Secondary Math Conceptually: Meeting Mathematics Standards, an interactive computer-based instruction course designed
to expand your methodology for teaching mathematics. The course will explore an
instructional methodology that incorporates strategies for teaching concepts
both constructively and contextually. The goal is for you to gain a deeper
understanding of the underlying concepts of various math topics and explore the
principles of teaching those concepts to learners. You will also explore how to
develop computational thinking, which is foundational to learning computer
science. The course expands teaching methodologies that support many federal
and state standards, as well as STEM concepts related to technology. This
course will focus on the topics of integers, fractions, factoring, and
functions and on the key strategies that connect mathematics and technology.
This computer-based instruction course
is a self-supporting program that provides instruction, structured practice,
and evaluation all on your home or school computer. Technical support information can be found in
the Help section of your course.
Title: |
Teaching
Secondary Math Conceptually: Meeting Mathematics Standards |
Publisher: |
Virtual
Education Software, inc. 2017, Revised 2020, Revised 2024 |
Instructor: |
Kim Chappell, Ed.D. |
The structure and format of most
distance learning courses presume a high level of personal and academic
integrity in completion and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a
distance-learning course are expected to adhere to the following standards of
academic conduct.
Academic work submitted by the individual (such as papers,
assignments, reports, tests) shall be the student’s own work or appropriately
attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct source. Submission of
commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if they are one’s own
work is unacceptable.
The individual will
encourage honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or
information to another person with knowledge that these materials or
information will be used improperly.
Violations of these
academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade and
subsequent loss of credit for the course.
This course is designed to be an
informational course with application to classroom or academic-related
settings. The teaching strategies are designed to be used primarily with middle
and high school students, or any students who struggle with understanding
mathematics.
·
Expand conceptual understanding of integers, fractions,
factoring, and functions
·
Explore a conceptual methodology of teaching math
·
Develop skill in designing
constructive learning experiences
·
Explore strategies to support learning the skills outlined
in mathematics federal legislation
·
Investigate integrating concrete modeling to support
conceptual teaching
The course Teaching
Secondary Math Conceptually: Meeting Mathematics Standards is designed to explain
and connect the major concepts, procedures, and reasoning processes of
mathematics. Current standards and practices in math education will be
discussed to outline a teaching methodology that is conceptual, contextual, and
constructive. STEM concepts related to
technology, including the computational thinking strategies of decomposition,
abstraction, pattern recognition and algorithm design, are integrated in the
teaching methodology. Activities are presented to explain underlying
concepts and to illustrate constructive teaching. The course has been divided
into four chapters covering four math topics: integers, fractions, factoring,
and functions. Emphasis is
on exploring how to develop mathematical understanding and computational
thinking in learners to support achievement in mathematics and technology.
As a student you will be
expected to:
·
Complete all four information sections showing a
competent understanding of the material presented in each section.
·
Complete all four section examinations, showing a
competent understanding of the material presented. You
must obtain an overall score of 70%
or higher, with no individual exam score below 50%, to pass this course. *Please note: Minimum exam
score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you should
refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score
requirements are.
·
Complete a review of any
section on which your examination score was below 50%.
·
Retake any examination,
after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a
minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a
minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please
note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university;
therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your
minimum exam score requirements are.
·
Complete a course
evaluation form at the end of the course.
The first chapter outlines the teaching
methodology; it includes a discussion of the conceptual, contextual, and
constructive teaching of math. Comparisons are drawn between traditional math
education and conceptual teaching. The chapter also explores the methodology in
relationship to mathematics federal legislation and STEM concepts, including
computational thinking. The chapter also explores the four key strategies for
connecting technology and mathematics (decomposition, abstraction, pattern
recognition, and algorithm design). The chapter concludes with strategies for
developing conceptual understanding of integers. Example activities are
presented to both explain mathematical concepts and illustrate teaching
strategies.
The second chapter explores fractional
understandings. Geometric and newly produced manipulatives are used to develop
essential concepts and computational principles. All operations are presented
using manipulatives to teach for fractional
understanding. In addition, a unique strategy is presented to find common
denominators and equivalent and reduced fractions. Example activities are
presented to both explain mathematical concepts and illustrate teaching
strategies. The computational thinking strategies of decomposition, pattern
recognition, and algorithm design are expanded.
The third chapter develops concepts of
prime numbers and factoring. Foundational
principles for factoring are developed and applied to a variety of complex
operations. Conceptual understandings are expanded to construct knowledge of
exponents. Example activities are presented to both explain mathematical
concepts and illustrate teaching strategies. Technology concepts are connected
using the strategies of decomposition, abstraction, and algorithm design.
The final chapter explores the
principles of functions. Strategies presented are designed to construct
foundational understanding of functions. Example activities are presented to
both explain mathematical concepts and illustrate teaching strategies. The
computational thinking strategies of decomposition, abstraction and pattern
recognition are expanded. The chapter concludes with a discussion of standards
for practice and for integrating modeling into middle and high school math.
At the end of each chapter, you will be
expected to complete an examination designed to assess your knowledge. You may
take these exams a total of three times. Your last score will save, not the
highest score. After your third attempt,
each examination will lock and not allow further access. Your final grade for the course will be
determined by calculating an average score of all exams. This score will be printed on your final
certificate. As this is a self-paced
computerized instruction program, you may review course information as often as
necessary. You will not be able to exit any examinations until you have
answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam
before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are
expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.
Teaching Secondary Math
Conceptually: Meeting Mathematics Standards was developed by Dr. Kim
Chappell. Dr. Chappell is an associate professor of education at Fort Hays
State University in Kansas. Currently, she teaches graduate courses in the
Advanced Education Programs Department. She supervises research projects, mentors
students, and writes curriculum. Dr. Chappell has over 34 years of teaching
experience and holds two master’s degrees: a Master of
Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and a Master of Science in Mathematics
Education. Dr. Chappell has a Doctor of Education degree in Instructional
Leadership.
You may contact the instructor by
emailing Dr. Chappell at kim_chappell@virtualeduc.com
or calling her at 509-891-7219, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
PST. Phone messages will be answered within 24 hours. Phone conferences will be limited to ten minutes per student,
per day, given that this is a self-paced instructional program. Please do not
contact the instructor about technical problems, course glitches, or other
issues that involve the operation of the course.
If you have questions or problems
related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the
problem persists please check our support pages for
FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of your course.
If you need personal assistance
then email support@virtualeduc.com
or call 509-891-7219. When contacting technical support, please know your course version number (it is located at the bottom
left side of the Welcome Screen) and your operating system,
and be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call.
Please refer to VESi’s website: www.virtualeduc.com
or contact VESi if you have further questions about the compatibility of your
operating system.
Refer to the addendum
regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be
Submitted and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also
note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete
that are not listed in this syllabus.
Aho,
A.V. (2011). Ubiquity symposium: Computation and computational thinking.
https://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=1922682
Bingolbali, E. (2011). Multiple solutions to
problems in mathematics teaching: Do teachers really value them? Australian
Journal of Teacher Education 36(1). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n1.2
Cuny,
J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J. M. (2010, November 17). Demystifying
computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Unpublished manuscript in
progress, referenced in http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
Burns,
M. (1998). Math: Facing an American
phobia. Math Solutions.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in
theory and practice. Basic Books.
Glatthorn, A., Boschee, F.,
Whitehead, B., & Boschee, B. (2018). Curriculum leadership: Strategies
for development and implementation (5th ed.). Sage.
K–12 Computer Science Framework.
(2016). http://www.k12cs.org
Langer-Osuna,
J. M. (2017). Authority,
identity, and collaborative mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0237
Lee, I. (2016). Reclaiming the roots of
CT. CSTA: The voice of K–12 computer science education and its educators.
http://www.witty.ca/uploads/4/7/6/4/4764474/csta_voice_magazine__march_2016-pp3-5-compthinking.pdf
Liljedahl, P., & May, Marlin.
(2023). Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, Grades K–12: 14
teaching practices for enhancing learning. Corwin.
Maier, G. (2006). The algebra blues. Connect Magazine, 19(3),
24–25. Retrieved August 27, 2024, from https://www.mathlearningcenter.org/curriculum/free/additional/gene/the_algebra_blues
Mailund,
T. (2021). Introduction to computational thinking: Problem solving,
algorithms, data structures, and more (1st ed.). Apress.
McClain,
K., & Schmitt, P. (2004, January). Teachers grow mathematically together: A
case study from data analysis. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9(5),
274–279. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.9.5.0274
Muschla, J. A., Muschla,
G. R., & Muschla-Berry, E. (2015). Teaching the common core math standards with
hands-on activities: Grades 9–12. Jossey-Bass.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical
success for all. Author.
National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2017). Compendium
for research in mathematics education. Author.
Sheldon,
E. (2017, March 30). STEM: Computational thinking across the curriculum.
Retrieved August 27, 2024, from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/computational-thinking-across-the-curriculum-eli-sheldon
Thornson,
K. (2018, March 18). Early learning strategies for developing computational
thinking skills. Retrieved August 27, 2024, from https://www.gettingsmart.com/2018/03/18/early-learning-strategies-for-developing-computational-thinking-skills/
Van de Walle,
J. A., Karp, K. S., Bay-Williams, J. M., Wray, J.,
& Brown, E. T. (2022). Elementary
and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (11th ed.). Pearson.
Wills,
J. (2010). Learning to love math: Teaching strategies
that change student attitudes and get results. ASCD.
Course content is updated
every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be
active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the
command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find
whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding
organization’s web home page.
12/23/24
JN